
Introduction.For those new to the area of
matrix mathematics the following is an evaluation of Alfred Hubbards nine(9) coil alternative energy
generator. The author G.D.Mutch has
reviewed one design of Alfred Hubbards material an arrived at the
conclusion that Hubbards technology can be applied to matrix
mathematics, which in part is very similar to Professor
J.R.R.Searls 'Law of the Squares ©'. The following material will show people how Hubbards
design is first formulated into a balanced mathematical square
matrix and then transformed out of the matrix into mathematical
ratios that can be used in an actual working model...
Hubbards Original DesignHubbards dimensions on the nine(9) coil transformer design:
figure 1a
figure 1b. The dimensions in the table of figure 1b are
taken from Hubbards actual nine(9) coil design.
Matrix Formulation.The author will transform the values of Hubbards
nine(9) coil design of figure1 into a 3 x 3 balanced matrix. The
8 Coils around 1 inner coil equates to 9 coils which can be
transformed into the 3 x 3 matrix below (see
figure 2).
1. Derived values from the above matrix :The above matrix of figure 2 has a sum line value of 147. No matter which way you add the rows, columns or diagonals the line value will add to 147. The following values tabulated in random order are then derived from the balanced matrix . These tabulated values are the actual physically wound coil dimensions from which you can build the Hubbard nine(9) coil energy transformer device.
{* This is a hypothetical coil added here by the author. See below text for more information.}
2. Deriving Matrix Coil Turns = Volume :To derive the turns ratio you simply multiple the centre value 49 by multiples of 2. When you reach a value of Centre x 8 = 392 you will notice that the sum of the 8 outer cells around the centre value also equal the value 392. This is similar to Professor Searls Law of the Squares. See the table of figure 4.
figure 4 (* Denotes alternative calculations that could be used in actual coil designs.) NB. Alfred Hubbard is obviously using binary in his calculations...
3. Deriving Matrix Copper Wire dimensions.To derive the copper wire gauge from the matrix you simply divide the turns (see figure 4) by the line value/cylinder length 147mm. Example, 147/196 = 0.75 mm wire diameter. Knowing this last formula we can now construct a table with multiple choice coil dimensions for any derived wire size. (see figure 5)
4. Matrix Final Physical Coil Dimensions :By using the matrix of figure 2 we have derived the optimal mathematical ratio values from which we can design the actual coil dimensions. Recapping, from the matrix we have derived :
We may therefore tabulate all the values in the above steps into one easy to read table.(See figure 5) You may now use this table as a quick reference to build any coil from your chosen wire size. Coil Dimensions Table
figure 5. * Denotes the optional 3rd coil dimension. As I am lead to believe, this third coil is not in Hubbards original nine(9) coil design. The author has added this coil here to allow research into its possible further use as a power multiplying coil. It may be obvious to people that using a thicker wire diameter you will lose a corresponding number of turns per coil/cylinder. This then equates to a drop in voltage, but you should also gain with a corresponding current increase. Inversely, if you choose a thinner diameter wire gauge you will have a voltage increase for the corresponding drop in current. The trick would be to choose a wire diameter ratio for the frequency, current and voltage to wish to use. Hubbard stated he could use copper wire of different diameter/gauges to complete one totally wound coil. The lengths shown in the above table equals the total copper wire length in meters that you will require to wind one complete coil onto the cylinder/former. The values do not include external connection flying leads.You will need extra wire for termination. To use the above table of figure 5 simply read down the vertical column of the desired wire diameter/gauge, then read off the Turns and the Total Length of wire for each of the 30mm,49mm and 68mm diameter coils. Example, if you chose to use a wire gauge of 0.75mm you would use the following values :
The values listed above represent one totally wound coil per cylinder. Hubbard used 8 coils on the outer peripheral of the inner coil, so you will need to multiply the 30mm dia values by 8 to get the total resource material required.
END.
Miscellaneous Errata :The below original Hubbard frequency information
of figure 6 is take from one design of the Hubbards
transformer device. The original reference image of Hubbards
transformer device was taken from Geoff Egels Hubbard webpage web site. I had
once believed, and have now partly confirmed, that Hubbards
transformer device follows one of the aetheric/magnetic field
matrices which are similar in part to that of J.R.R.Searls 'Law
Of The Squares'. I believe the Hubbard coil/transformer device is
tuned to the universal energy fields by utilising natural
mathematical matrix law ratios. Simulating Hubbards Math Calculations: Where and how does Hubbard derived most of his calculations? For example, his step value 5.75.? A suggestion is to use Hubbards coil length 146 / 5.75 = 25.39. This value 25.39 is very close to the value 25.4 which equals the imperial inch to metric value, or maybe binary (2^8) 2 = 254. Why did Hubbard choose the golden section as his start ratio ? Could Hubbard have use this value 1.6 as his base unit of measure ? Other calculations deriving Hubbards original math:
Reversing Hubbards calculations we can derive a
more accurate value for Hubbards Natural Frequency : 2^19 x 5.340
= 2799697.92 Hz. The following are Hubbards original values along
with the authors modified values in the table of figure 6.
figure 6 Hubbard used a coil/cylinder height of 146mm. The true coil/cylinder length ratio according to Hubbards text, should have been his own given ratio 5.75 x 25.4 = 146.05mm. The true line value of 147 mapped from with in the matrix of figure 2 is not the same as Hubbards value 146.05, which is missing 0.95mm. If you take small liberties an assume Hubbards own calculations of 1.44Ghz ( 1/ 0.694444 similar to Bruce Cathies reciprocal harmonic speed of light) as a base ratio; the step value becomes 2.88 ( Hubbards frequency )Ghz /2 = 1.44 Ghz x 3.141592654(pi) = 4.523893421. If you use this 4.52 value as Hubbards step ratio in a new matrix, then the completed matrix line and coil length value becomes 146.97mm. This value is then 0.03 different to the authors 147mm matrix line value of figure 2. By transposing the matrix step value of figure 2 as Hubbards step value an original frequency values in figure 6, I am able to reverse engineer and derive a value of 4.75 / pi = 1.51 x 2 = 3.02 Ghz. What could this value represent ? I wonder why Hubbard chose binary harmonic values ? Is Hubbard using the values from the table of figure 6 as input an output frequencies ? Example, should you input 2^19 = 524288 hz and the output = 5.340Hz ? Could a lanthanide element series or a radioactive isotope be used as a cylinder former for an input constant pulse frequency, and thus producing an over unity constant output by not having to input an EMF into the primary coil(s) ? Again using similar math techniques as Hubbard I can simulate his frequency values together with my own values from the matrix of figure 2, and derive the below theoretical comparison table of figure 6. The following table will show the reader how the author derived a constant frequency from a binary ratio and the matrix line value or coil length in this case.
figure 7 Natural Matrix Frequency = 441 Hz In my honest opinion I believe Hubbard could have
placed another coil over the inner most coil an produced more
output power yet again. Hubbard stated that power output of his
nine(9) coil design was 3:1 ie. 3 times the output as per the
input. I believe if Hubbard used a 3rd coil design as in the
matrix above, then the output could step up to 14 :1. The
optional 3rd coil could be the 68mm diameter coil from the
matrix. Was/is the original coil and cylinder in the original
plan design? I am unable to determine if this is the case as I
have only perused one portion of Hubbards original designs. The above miscellaneous errata is just an evaluation of Hubbards math methods which the author has used to simulate possible comparisons against the natural method of a matrix. A couple of different slants on the same math methods have been added above for the reader to compare and research. I feel the reader should first research with Hubbards own successful coil/transformer calculations and design before moving on to the information presented here in. The author presents the above matrix information as a further refinement to Hubbards own methods, to support Hubbards claim to a successful alternative energy device.
G.D. Mutch More importantly : don't let ego and greed cloud your better judgement. Please share all your research findings with others. Let's all make a conscious decision to create a cleaner, freer living world for all...
Disclaimer :
Acknowledgments:The Hubbard Matrix Math is Copyright © 2000, by
G.D.Mutch
Geoff Egels Natural Energy Web Site
Author G.D.Mutch 
Encyclopedia of free energy now on CD click for more information